CAN A CONCUSSION
CAUSE LOSS OF SMELL?
It's long been known that people who suffer a major concussion can lose their sense of smell temporarily and also develop affective problems, such as anxiety and depression. Now scientists have found that's true even for people who get a minor concussion. Jul 23, 2019
Hit your head, lose your sense of smell - ScienceDaily
"Surprisingly, a test of olfactory function is not currently a part of the concussion protocol even though smell loss has been a common occurrence following head injuries. A test of olfactory function and CTE in real time would be a “game-changer” in our understanding of repetitive head injuries. A 5-min smell test given by a single technician could objectively track CTE over time." Science Direct.com
NIH - Head trauma and olfactory function
Click Here for links to 62 studies.
Disorders of Taste and Smell in clinical neurology. These disorders commonly occur in head trauma.
Click here
ABSTRACT
Chemosensory disorders, primarily olfactory, have diagnostic significance for prevalent human illnesses, but the multitude of smells makes measuring function appear daunting. The olfactory system operates under dynamic natural sensing conditions in which many individual odor chemicals are waxing and waning. Yet, in experimentally controlled simulations, mixture-component selective adaptation shows individual or shared prominent characteristic odors are detected but molecular stimulus features are not. As in other biological chemical signaling systems, including taste, odors activate dedicated receptors (OR). Given rapid OR adaptation with the passage of time, individual odor recognition is momentary. Receptive dendrites of the nearly 400 genetically variable human-OR in the olfactory epithelium critically project axons to the olfactory bulb through perforations in the cribriform plate of the skull. Analytic chemical-quality codes detect single odor-mixture components. However, identities of no more than 3 or 4 most salient odors are perceived due to central mixture-suppression, the mutual inhibition among diverse olfactory-bulb or cortical neurons. The componental codes allow olfaction to readily discern odor quality and valence of a wide range of unrelated chemicals, a few at a time. Head trauma may result in a partial or complete loss of smell and facial trauma a loss of taste-nerve function. Testing smell could plot the course of recovery from chronic traumatic encephalopathies that prevail in contact sports. Measuring brain function with olfaction would provide simpler and more direct monitoring of prognosis than biochemical sensors.
​
KEYWORDS
Mixture-component perception
Head trauma
Contact sports
INTRODUCTION
Chemosensory disorders have diagnostic significance for prevalent human illnesses. Primarily olfactory, they are frequently considered gustatory due to the oral retro-nasal origin of some odorous volatiles.1 However, the multitude of possible smells, recently exaggerated from thousands to more than a trillion,2 makes measuring individual odor sensing appear daunting.3, 4 Furthermore, this conundrum has led to attempts to segregate roles of relevant functional groups,5 or use of crowd-sourcing methods,6 to count the number of recognizable multi-component odor objects that an individual can recognize.7
Odor component recognition
As in other biological chemical signaling systems, including taste-sensing8, 9, 10; distinct odors likely activate dedicated receptors (OR).11, 12 However, given the rapid odor adaptation with the passage of time, odor recognition is momentary.4 The ortho-nasal odor-stimulus is limited to the inhalation phase by the act of sniffing,13 and on the same time scale as sniffing, the odor rapidly adapts. To further complicate the stimulus situation, odor sensing occurs in dynamic natural sensing settings in which odors of many individual odor chemicals are simultaneously either waxing or waning. The olfactory system needs to be able to identify chemicals of harm or value under these conditions. Surprisingly, this may be accomplished by a combination of ‘mixture suppression and selective adaptation.’
In experimentally controlled simulations, mixture-component selective adaptation shows individual or shared prominent characteristic odors (‘odor notes’) are detected by humans.4 However, individual molecular stimulus features are not. The perceptual saliencies of two individually presented components, A and B ‘odor notes’, are represented by bright colors in Fig. 1. The saliencies are reduced when both components are within a mixture (below), the feature known as ‘mixture suppression’ in olfaction,14, 15, 16 and taste.17 However, when component A alone is adapted for 10 s (center), its ambient salience in the following mixture (below) is further weakened but un-adapted component B is ‘released’ from mixture inhibition. This startling outcome resulting by combining ‘mixture suppression’ and ‘selective adaptation’ of independent stimuli (defined as those that do not cross-adapt) explains how the olfactory system is able to identify individual mixture components in few-component mixtures.3, 18, 4 Thus, the odor mixtures are analyzed; they are not synthesized by a combinatorial process into a distinctly different quality. Gustatory mixtures of independent taste stimuli are also analyzed via the combination of ‘mixture suppression’ and ‘selective adaptation’.19
CONCLUSIONS
Simpler and more direct measurement of living brain function may be achieved with olfactory testing during football games and in other sports where players experience ‘repetitive head impacts”. To date, the U.S. National Football League concussion protocol involves observation and evaluations of cognitive function from onset to recovery. Surprisingly, a test of olfactory function is not currently a part of the concussion protocol even though smell loss has been a common occurrence following head injuries. A test of olfactory function and CTE in real time would be a “game-changer” in our understanding of repetitive head injuries. A 5-min smell test given by a single technician
CONFLICT OF INTEREST/FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
This work was supported by the University of Connecticut Foundation, the School of Dental Medicine and the University of Connecticut Clinical Research Center.
REFERENCES
1. R.L. Doty
Olfactory dysfunction and its measurement in the clinic
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1 (2015), pp. 28-33
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
2. C. Bushdid, M.O. Magnasco, L.B. Vosshall, A. Keller
Humans can discriminate more than 1 trillion olfactory stimuli
Science, 343 (2014), pp. 1370-1372
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
3. H.F. Goyert, M.E. Frank, J.F. Gent, T.P. Hettinger
Characteristic component odors emerge from mixtures after selective adaptation
Brain Res Bull, 72 (2007), pp. 1-9
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
4. M.E. Frank, D.B. Fletcher, T.P. Hettinger
Recognition of the component odors in mixtures
Chem Senses, 42 (2017), pp. 537-546
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
5. K. Nara, L.R. Saraiva, X. Ye, L.B. Buck
A large-scale analysis of odor coding in the olfactory epithelium
J Neurosci, 31 (2011), pp. 9179-9191
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
6. A. Keller, R.C. Gerkin, Y. Guan, et al.
Predicting human olfactory perception from chemical features of odor molecules
Science, 355 (2017), pp. 820-826
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. J.W. Hsieh, A. Keller, M. Wong, R.S. Jiang, L.B. Vosshall
SMELL-S and SMELL-R: olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 114 (2017), pp. 11275-11284
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
8. J. Chandrashekar, C. Kuhn, Y. Oka, et al.
The cells and peripheral representation of sodium taste in mice
Nature, 464 (2010), pp. 297-301
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
9. G.Q. Zhao, Y. Zhang, M.A. Hoon, et al.
The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste
Cell, 115 (2003), pp. 255-266​
10. D.A. Yarmolinsky, C.S. Zuker, N.J. Ryba
Common sense about taste: from mammals to insects
Cell, 139 (2009), pp. 234-244​
11. L. Buck, R. Axel
A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition
Cell, 65 (1991), pp. 175-187
12. L.B. Buck
Unraveling the sense of smell (Nobel lecture)
Angew Chem Int Ed, 44 (2005), pp. 6128-6140
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
13. D.G. Laing
Natural sniffing gives optimum odour perception for humans
Perception, 12 (1983), pp. 99-117
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
14. D.G. Laing, M.E. Willcox
Perception of components in binary odour mixtures
Chem Senses, 7 (1983), pp. 249-264
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
15. D.G. Laing, H. Panhuber, M.E. Willcox, E.A. Pittman
Quality and intensity of binary odor mixtures
Physiol Behav, 33 (1984), pp. 309-319
View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
16. A. Livermore, D.G. Laing
Influence of training and experience on the perception of multicomponent odor mixtures
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 22 (1996), pp. 267-277
View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
17. L.M. Bartoshuk
Taste mixtures: is mixture suppression related to compression
Physiol Behav, 14 (1975), pp. 643-649
View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
18. M.E. Frank, H.F. Goyert, T.P. Hettinger
Time and intensity factors in identification of components of odor mixtures
Chem Senses, 35 (2010), pp. 777-787
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
19. M.E. Frank, H.F. Goyert, B.K. Formaker, T.P. Hettinger
Effects of selective adaptation on coding sugar and salt tastes in mixtures
Chem Senses, 37 (2012), pp. 701-709
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
20. B. Renner, C.A. Mueller, J. Dreier, S. Faulhaber, W. Rascher, G. Kobal
The candy smell test: a new test for retronasal olfactory performance
Laryngoscope, 119 (2009), pp. 487-495
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
21. M.E. Frank
Chemoreception and perception
A.R. Hand, M.E. Frank (Eds.), Fundamentals of Oral Histology and Physiology, Wiley (2014), pp. 191-220
Google Scholar
22. D.G. Laing
Identification of single dissimilar odors is achieved by humans with a single sniff
Physiol Behav, 37 (1986), pp. 163-170
View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
23. D.G. Laing, C. Link, A.L. Jinks, I. Hutchinson
The limited capacity of humans to identify the components of taste mixtures and taste-odour mixtures
Perception, 31 (2002), pp. 617-635
View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
24. E.R. Reiter, R.M. Costanzo
Chemosensory impairment after traumatic brain injury: assessment and management
Int Neurotrauma Lett, 23 (2014), pp. 3-5
Google Scholar
25. K.J. Ressler, S.L. Sullivan, L.B. Buck
Information coding in the olfactory system: evidence for a stereotyped and highly organized epitope map in the olfactory bulb
Cell, 79 (1994), pp. 1245-1255
View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
26. P. Mombaerts, F. Wang, C. Dulac, et al
Visualizing an olfactory sensory map
Cell, 87 (1996), pp. 675-686
View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
27. G.M. Shepherd
The olfactory bulb: a simple system in the mammalian brain
E.R. Kandel (Ed.), Handbook of Physiology, Section 1: The Nervous System, American Physiological Society, Bethesda: MD (1977), pp. 945-968
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. M. Yokoi, K. Mori, S. Nakanishi
Refinement of odor molecule tuning by dendrodendritic synaptic inhibition in the olfactory bulb
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 92 (1995), pp. 3371-3375
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
29. K. Mori, H. Nagao, Y. Yoshihar
The olfactory bulb: coding and processing of odor molecule information
Science, 286 (1999), pp. 711-715
View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
30. Y. Yu, T.S. McTavish, M.L. Hines, G.M. Shepherd, C. Valenti, M. Migliore
Sparse distributed representation of odors in a large-scale olfactory bulb circuit
PLos Comput Biol, 9 (2013), Article e1003014
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
31. A. Maresh, G.D. Rodriguez, M.C. Whitman, C.A. Greer
Principles of glomerular organization in the human olfactory bulb–implications for odor processing
PLoS One, 3 (2008), p. e2640
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
32. K. Moriya-Ito, I. Tanaka, Y. Umitsu, M. Ichikawa, H. Tokuno
The olfactory bulb and the number of its glomeruli in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus)
Neurosci Res, 93 (2015), pp. 158-163
View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
33. J.S. Isaacson
Odor representations in mammalian cortical circuits
Curr Opin Neurobiol, 20 (2010), pp. 328-331
View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
34. C. Poo, J.S. Isaacson
Odor representations in olfactory cortex: “sparse” coding, global inhibition, and oscillations
Neuron, 62 (2009), pp. 850-861
View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
35. A.M. Boyd, J.F. Sturgill, C. Poo, J.S. Isaacson
Cortical feedback control of olfactory bulb circuits
Neuron, 76 (2012), pp. 1161-1174
View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
36. P.W. Schofield, T.M. Moore, A. Gardner
Traumatic brain injury and olfaction: a systematic review
Front Neurol, 5 (2014), p. 5
Google Scholar
37. A. Ciofalo, G. Zambetti, M. Fusconi, et al.
Olfactory dysfunction after minor head trauma
J Head Trauma Rehabil, 26 (2011)
418–418
Google Scholar
38. J.P. Bonardi, F.H. da Costa, G.A. Stabile, C.L. Pereira-Stabile
Traumatic dysgeusia, an unusual complication of facial trauma: a case report
J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 74 (2016), pp. 1416-1419
View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
39. D.M. Yousem, R.J. Geckle, W.B. Bilker, D.A. McKeown, R.L. Doty
Posttraumatic olfactory dysfunction: MR and clinical evaluation
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 17 (1996), pp. 1171-1179
View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
40. M.L. Alosco, J. Jarnagin, Y. Tripodis, et al.
Olfactory function and associated clinical correlates in former National Football League players
J Neurotrauma, 34 (2017), pp. 772-780
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
41. A.C. McKee, R.C. Cantu, C.J. Nowinski, et al.
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in athletes: progressive tauopathy after repetitive head injury
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 68 (2009), pp. 709-735
View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
42. C.A. Tagge, A.M. Fisher, O.V. Minaeva, et al.
Concussion, microvascular injury, and early tauopathy in young athletes after impact head injury and an impact concussion mouse model
Brain, 141 (2018), pp. 422-458
CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar